Failed Badlans and all the controversy behind HRT
Posted by Aga
Hi Friend,
Slightly later than usual, but I’m back with another bite of peri-knowledge. I was supposed to still be out at Badlands, but my own health journey ended the event prematurely (note: it’s unlikely perimenopause-related; it seems I’ve been dealt an unlucky hand with the genes…). |
![]() |
This week, I wanted to touch on the topic of the controversy behind hormonal replacement therapy. Some people swear by it, claiming it’s the solution to all perimenopausal symptoms. Some genuinely believe it's poison that gives you cancer.
The truth is: it's neither of those things.
It’s a tool that, if used well and in conjunction with other lifestyle changes, can vastly improve your life and protect you in the long run (your brain, bones and heart)
However, you often hear references to the study from 14 years ago, which started the belief that HRT increases the risk of getting cancer. Like many findings from that time, the conclusion was drawn from very flawed numbers and exaggerated for a dramatic effect.
And while I’m not saying that you must take HRT, I want to make sure that you make the decision based on accurate information.
Here are the facts:
I am deeply passionate about this topic (and therefore spent way too much time reading about it), and I’d happily point you in the direction of all resources you can use to inform yourselves on these.
But ultimately - I’d like you to take the matter of hormonal replacement therapy with an open mind and treat it as of equal value as lifestyle or nutrition adjustments - they all work best when implemented together.
Thank you for being here, Aga
P.S. Next week I’ll be talking about the individuality of the perimenopause experience. If you’d like to share the summary of your journey and don’t mind it being shared anonymously with other readers, drop me a line. |







Comments